Preguntas y Contestaciones Sobre el Desarrollo Humano, Psic. 3025

Custom Search

Preguntas y Contestaciones Sobre el Desarrollo Humano, Psic. 3025

 

Construya una tabla sobre el desarrollo humano con sus respectivas etapas, para cada etapa escriba tres palabras que describan el grupo y la edad, explique cual etapa fue la más difícil de describir y revele quien, si pensó en alguien, cuando estuvo elaborando la etapa en la tabla.  

  

La etapa más difícil de describir fue la etapa de 81 años en adelante, ya que la mayoría de las personas en esa etapa sufren de deterioro físico y mental-psicológico. Pensé en la población de envejecientes renegados que sufren su deterioro, solos o abusados en completa negligencia.

Mencione el planteamiento de Burman sobre el concepto de desarrollo:

            El planteamiento sobre el concepto de desarrollo que Burman nos presenta proviene de la teoría feminista con la intención de presentar que este aspecto de la psicología sirve para regular la conducta  femenina en el área familiar, marginalizar la clase trabajadora y la minoría étnica, la población de mujeres y psicopatologizando sus experiencias como madres.

Mencione el planteamiento de Papalia sobre el concepto de desarrollo:

            El planteamiento sobre el concepto de desarrollo que Papalia presenta se destaca en el ser humano. Papalia se encarga de hacer énfasis  en que se respeten todos los periodos de la vida, se cree en la adaptación humana, se reconoce que las personas ayudan a moldear su propio desarrollo y se cree que el conocimiento es útil.   

Compare ambos, el tipo de discurso y el planteamiento general:

             En el trabajo de Burman el discurso es feminista, parte de la teoría feminista enfocándose en las niñas como sujeto, de construyendo la psicología evolutiva para revelar a la mujer en su entorno social activo y no pseudo teórico. En el trabajo de Papalia, se encuentran referencias que la autora utiliza sobre su experiencia como madre, mujer, trabajadora educadora y psicóloga. Dichas experiencias que esta tiene con su hija se denotan en los ejemplos que utiliza para describir etapas o teorías psicológicas.  

 

  

 

on Knowing

Custom Search

Nobody knows me, and  I don't know anybody.
This world is filled with desires and i have to satisfy them all. Mundane desires lead to enlightenment, that is how i reach nirvana; by fulfilling my mundane desires. How well do you know a person? You can never know them, but me,  I can, for I have a gift, I can see beyond the superficiality. -"I like your neurons I embrace them, the more you know, the more  i want to embrace you"- I say that to myself about myself.
My love is big, as big as the world, one day you will know, when i die again.

(music can take you back to that specific moment, when you knew things)

Nada sabemos, a nadie conocemos, solo somos y existimos, algunos sin proposito, otros con enga~nos bajo sus parpados.
Conocer, saber, tener y entender los secretos que yacen en vuestra mente, ?quien lo hace?
?Como lo hacen?

Devorarte hasta verte convertida en polvo.
Carcomerte hasta verte arrodillada en tus codos.
Beberte hasta saciar mi sed y luego beberte otra vez.
Someterte a mis cuidados hasta que nada quede en vuestro regazo. 


La vida es un enigma,
no volvereis a descifrarlo,
intentareis quebrantarlo,
alimentando esta obsesion;
sin reparos.


Dejad que vuestra sangre corra;
vuestra escencia que alimenta las impurezas.
Ya sabeis donde encontrarme:
en claustro escribiendo sentencias con sangre.
No os lamenteis por mi existencia,
siempre estare aqui,
energia y materia soy,
!siempre viva, vida eterna!


No os sorprendereis si aparezco en vuestro aposento con ofrendas de mirra e incienso,
no os alarmeis si aparezco en vuestro aposento con ofrendas y lamentos;
ningun intento es banal, todo tiene su verdad. 


Nunca temas,
yo secare tus lagrimas.
Nunca dudes,
yo lavare tus impuezas.
Nunca te nieges,
yo estare ahi para tenerte.


Si has de caer en el inferno de incesante sufrimiento, no os desespereis, yo siempre vendre por ti, confiad en mi, pero sobre todo confiad en ti. 


Sed de virtud tened,
yo os alimentare.
Sed de deseos mundanos tened,
yo os complacere. 
 Nunca temas, 
yo de ti cudare, 
soy tu sombra, 
que en pesadillas se asoma.

Te digo toma, bebe, sacia tu sed, entra en mi oasis antes que el sol os queme.
!Entrad, oh, entrad antes que sea vuestro final!

(La musica puede llevarte a ese lugar que antes habias visitado. Revivir sentimentos que una vez atras habias dejado)






  

Carr, Tortosa y Civera

Custom Search

Explicaciones y respuestas a preguntas planteadas

Según la lectura de Carr E.H. ¿Qué significa historia? Incluye la relación de la historia con los hechos.

            Historia es un proceso continuo de interacción entre el historiador y sus hechos, un dialogo sin fin entre el presente y el pasado. Historia significa interpretar. La historia es definida como un solido núcleo interpretativo rodeado de la pulpa de los hechos controvertibles. Toda la historia es la historia del pensamiento y la historia es la reproducción en la mente del historiador del pensamiento cuya historia estudia. La reconstitución del pasado en la mente del historiador se apoya en la evidencia empírica. Pero no es suyo un proceso empírico, ni puede constituir una mera enumeración de datos. La historia es un proceso de reconstitución, este rige la selección y la interpretación de los hechos: esto es precisamente lo que los hace hechos históricos. Los hechos de la historia nunca nos llegan en estado puro, ya que ni existen, ni pueden existir puramente: siempre hay una refracción al pasar por la mente de quien los recoge. No se puede hacer historia si el historiador no llega a establecer algún contacto con la mente de aquellos sobre los que escribe. Solo podemos captar el pasado y lograr comprenderlo a través del cristal del presente. El historiador pertenece a su época y está vinculado a ella por las condiciones de la existencia humana. La función del historiador no es ni amar el pasado ni emanciparse de él, sino dominarlo y comprenderlo, como clave para la comprensión del presente. El énfasis puesto en el papel del historiador como hacedor de la historia tiende, llevado a sus lógicas consecuencias, a descartar toda historia objetiva: la historia es lo que hace el historiador. 

Según la lectura de Tortosa y Civera, explique brevemente y mencione tres métodos historiográficos.

            Los tres métodos historiográficos se componen de la práctica positivista bajo la premisa del positivismo propulsado por Augusto Comte y comprenden; la practica evolutiva/ genética, la practica personalista y la practica naturalista. La práctica positivista se encarga de construir y reconstruir la dogmatica, racional y objetivamente. Su objetivo es la socialización del científico y el progreso desde lo a-científico hasta lo científico a través de la acumulación de conocimientos, superávit de errores y la búsqueda de la verdad en la ciencia como conocimiento; probar que la ciencia es verdad- ordenada y segura. El método evolutivo/genético considera a la historia de la psicología como consecuencia de historias o teorías, problemas o contenidos, centrada en temas específicos, e.g. El origen de las especies y el descenso del hombre de Charles Darwin. El método historiográfico personalista es la historia del resultado de realizaciones importantes científico individuales, e.g. Sigmund Freud y el psicoanálisis. En el método historiográfico naturalista la historia es el resultado de la acción del espíritu del tiempo y del lugar que facilita o inhibe la formación y aceptación de las teorías, e.g. el determinismo cultural. Los puntos de vista, teorías y consecuencias al historiador y el objetivo de todos estos métodos historiográficos están orientados al objetivo idealista, destacar el productor del conocimiento científico y sus resultados, el justificacionismo pretentista, la glorificación, el progreso y desarrollo de la ciencia    

            Según Tortosa y Civera, explique el objeto de estudio en la historia de la psicología.       

El objeto de estudio en la historia de la psicología comprende a los teóricos y su interpretación acerca de la naturaleza, factores/funciones/estructuras psíquicas, conciencia inconsciente, alma, y conducta.   El objeto metodológico comprende el experimento de laboratorio, experimento biótico, estudio de campo, estadística, análisis de trauma, catarsis hipnótica e interpretación de sueños. La historiografía de la psicología frente a la filosofía de la ciencia, e.g. Feyera Bend, Harson, Kuhn, Lakatos, Toulmin, Laudan, Popper, Koertge, Hall, Bachelard, Lenoble… La filosofía de la ciencia sin la historia de la ciencia es vacía. La historia de la ciencia es la base o el contenido empírico de la filosofía de las ciencias, aquí se promueve una imagen cinemática de la ciencia y la empresa científica. Los objetos con los que la ciencia psicológica se enfrenta están todos ellos presentes con una naturaleza formada. Las actividades humanas, aspectos sociales e intelectuales son inseparables, el objetivo yace en generar contenido cognoscitivo y la reproducción de formaciones sociales.

Según la lectura de Tortosa y Civera, mencione la importancia de la historia de la ciencia en la historia de la psicología.            

            La importancia de la historia de la ciencia en la historia de la psicología yace en analizar las ideas como construcciones humanas bajo condiciones históricas, estudiar las relaciones entre actividades constructivistas: ideas, contexto social, cultura y disciplina. La psicología no encuentra en sus objetos de estudio el mundo natural, su historia explica el surgimiento de objetos psicológicos. La historia de la psicología es una de las ciencias más jóvenes, no fue sino hasta finales del siglo XIX que su presencia se hizo notar, pero sus raíces se extienden al pasado antiguo. A través de los siglos filósofos y académicos religiosos han trabajado con la noción del origen de la naturaleza de la mente y el alma, por esta razón la historia del pensamiento psicológico comienza con la filosofía de la ciencia. 

A conversation with Death

Custom Search

Death

Death, are you my maker? Master I am your slave.

Death, are you proud of me? Master I am your gentle fiend.

Death, are you ready for my plea? Master I am ready for thee.

Death, is it you or is it me? I need you, and you need me.

Oh, death my sweetest misery, you rejoice my dreams.

In my darkest hour death comes to redeem me, not you, me.

I am the slave; death is my master, ever so enchanting.

Under a dark cloud of dust, we are everlasting.

I know what I want,

I know what you need,

You want to see me suffer?

I am on my knees.

It’s the sweetest ritual of misery;

To know, to feel, the sanity.

I can see you reaching out for me,
never confounded, always decided.

I can tell by the way you breathe,
your death inside of me.

“I can feel your blood, everlasting heartbeats, escaping swiftly into darkness”- proclaims Master Death ever enchanting.

“Death, feel my nails digging into your chest, is there a heart that I can eat inside somewhere? Master, master, do I have something to gain?”- (this is my plea).

“I want to be punished, I want to obey, I will do anything you say”- Reveals Master Death somberly.

Death be proud, you take the best and the fouled,

Death be proud, you take the flawed and the geniuses,

Death be proud, you take the innocence and the evilness.

Alas, Oh, Death! "How much do I love you?" You inquire into my descent.

"Not enough to save you my dear Master Death, not enough to save you", I say again and again.

For I have no soul,

I have only my love,

I give only my consecrated body

An offering to my master,

If he will graciously take me under his wings;

As an apprentice, a mentor in slavering.

I’d listened to the words he’d say,

But in his voice I felt decay,

The sweetest chant you’d ever heard

It took the tears, it eased the pain.

Master Death everlasting’s embrace

Still cold inviting ever standing, pure grace.

Apprentice of death, slave to the master.

Master, oh master, let us drink from the sacred torrid waters of time.

Let the wine flow into the catacombs of your decadence;

Let us rejoice into the dawn and descent of men!

Death become my maker, master is the song into my dreamscapes!

Death Be Not Proud

Custom Search

Death Be Not Proud - a poem by John Donne Death be not proud, though some have called thee Mighty and dreadfull, for, thou art not soe, For, those, whom thou think'st, thou dost overthrow, Die not, poore death, nor yet canst thou kill mee. From rest and sleepe, which but thy pictures bee, Much pleasure, then from thee, much more must flow, And soonest our best men with thee doe goe, Rest of their bones, and soules deliverie. Thou art slave to Fate, Chance, kings, and desperate men, And dost with poyson, warre, and sicknesse dwell, And poppie, or charmes can make us sleepe as well, And better then thy stroake; why swell'st thou then? One short sleepe past, wee wake eternally, And death shall be no more; death, thou shalt die. Death Be Not Proud by John Donne

The Cali Chronicles

Custom Search

Her Mind Is Her Enemy

“He lives inside my mouth, tells me what to say.” Manson, M. (1995). Antichrist Superstar. New Orleans, USA: Interscope Records. 

Human Sexuality: She knows about herself, knows her body, loves her body, and praises her body. She knows how to enjoy herself; she knows how to enjoy other bodies as well. She makes a connection, at times intellectual, at times superficial, and she takes that premise into account when sharing with other bodies. She views herself as she is, big lumps of curves imperfect and soft, and she likes it all the way home. She knows a secret that no else knows, a secret that people around her try to hide when they cherish time together. Her eyes are cautious, mindful, and aware of the reality.

  

  What is perfection? Is it in the mind of the thinker, in the eyes of the beholder? What is beauty? She is beauty, she is, because she feels it, and she knows she is the only one upholding that opinion of her. In that sense, she feels comfortable in her own skin, but at the same time she does not want to impose her point of view on others. The dirty little secret nobody wants to say out loud she knows it all too well. She has grown accustomed to that routine, human beings and their thoughts, so polluted, so constricted, is either black and white, no gray areas; no alternatives, no acceptance of deviations. She cannot change their minds, at times she thinks a lobotomy will serve well, yet there is no way to perform it. 

  The secret: People pretend to like each other; they do it all the time, without even realizing it at times, or ever too revealing of their intrinsic dislike. They are hate mongers. Either way, she knows it, for she analyzes every mental calculation, every neural connection, every synapse act, she knows it all too well. Hate mongers, in their twisted sickness of dislike for others will go as far as to do things they normally would not do in order to please themselves and to obtain instant gratification. Why? Because they need it, they need to feel something, even if it comes from the most despicable person they can think of.

  Beyond a certain point there is no return, once hate mongers have reached that point; they show a wide range of behavioral changes in their attitudes towards the person they are with at that particular moment. It is revealed in the gaze, the eyes, the so called windows of the soul: in the way they look or do not look at each other, the visual stimulation starts to get affected by their decision to put themselves in that position. Sentiments of regrets begin to crawl in their minds. Yet they do not know that they are creating their dislike on purpose, in that sense, they are atrophying their own mental processes.

  Cognitive dissonance is what hate mongers experience while they are “sharing” with the other person. They want to do it but they find the other person not in their range of taste, yet they need to do it or else. Is this a punishment they put themselves through? They pretend to like a person in order to get instant gratification, so they think, yet, they still feel disgusted by the person they are with. They feel disgusted because they cannot accept themselves, and they fool themselves into thinking they have high self esteem, so high that they think they deserve someone better. Intrinsically they are fooling themselves, and ultimately atrophying mental processes that can benefit them if they only tried to rid themselves of the dislike, and the discomfort they have created for themselves in the beginning.  

   She knows all of this, yet she still goes full metal jacket on into the engagement. Why? Because is part of who she is, can she change the point of view of hate mongers about themselves and others? She cannot dare to try; it is too difficult a task. She will always be herself, her loving self, no hatred towards her body. Yet; hate mongers do not like her body, she knows this all too well, and she has grown accustomed to please them, to not make them feel uncomfortable when they see her. At times despondence is what she feels about the situation, one that can be changed truthfully if she only disregards other people’s feelings, opinions, points of views, likes and dislikes about herself and her body, and ultimately about themselves. For she knows the root of the problem lies not in her body, but in the mind of the hate monger that despises her body.

   She says to herself: “If the hate mongers do not like my body, then why do they submit to seeing my body or parts of my body, ever showing disdain for me?” She wants people to be able to enjoy themselves as well as she enjoys herself corporally. It does not matter how hard hate mongers try to hide their disgust for her, she always knows how their brain work, what they need and what they can or cannot take. She knows brain behavior and relations all too well, and she stills engages in situations of the sort; why? Because she has not met her match yet, someone who truly is free of misconceptions about body image and self esteem, someone who will easily enjoy herself without thinking that they deserve someone better than her, when in reality, people always will betray you and hate you, because is part of human nature. Hate mongers have so much self esteem that they think they are better than the person they choose to spend some time with, this happens more often than you think. 

Do not be fooled by hate mongers, be aware that they hate themselves so harshly that they can easily try to destroy your own happiness. Be mindful of a hate monger, a predator posing as a house pet, with hatred in their eyes, for themselves and for you. People like this act like they “accept” you, and she thinks: “accept me? No one needs to accept me, I am, I think, I act, I do, I am human, I am not a product, that you consume and above all I am a Woman.” She does not need acceptance from anyone but herself. Hate mongers always present themselves with confidence, yet they are judgmental of her body, and this is an inconvenience to her, to what she wants to say or do. She often says to herself: “isn’t it enough that I love my body? I do not need to satisfy hate mongers, because I am my own personal satisfaction”.

She has a plan…we will see next time.

 

  

                

Deconstructing feminist views

Custom Search

                                             Deconstructing feminist views:

The Thought is:

------"Confidence; is the sexiest thing a woman can have.

It's much sexier than any body part.

Women need a reason to have sex. 

Men just need a place.

A man can sleep around, no questions asked;

but if a woman makes nineteen or twenty mistakes she's a tramp".

Deconstruction:

1. Confidence; is the sexiest thing a woman can have.- 

Are women wholly confident? 

Can they honestly affirm their confidence? 

Why is confidence sexy? 

What is regarded to be sexy? 

What is sexy? 

Why do women have to be sexy?

Aren't there other qualities that can make a woman sexy?

2. It's much sexier than any body part.-

This is a negation of wome'ns bodies. 

There is a relation between confidence and sexual appeal.

A mandatory sentence: in order to be sexy you have to be confident, and if you are not confident you are not sexy, and if you are not sexy, your body is not sexy. 

3. Women need a reason to have sex.- 

Reason is: The basis or motive for an action, decision or conviction. A declaration made to explain or justify action, desicion or conviction. An underlying fact or cause that provides logical sense for a premise or occurrence. 

 Women need a reason to have sex because they are judged by the patriarchal system and the feminist system. They think they have to control their urges to have sex, by finding a valid reason to have sex with someone, and then talking about it, discussing it whether if it's worth it or not to have sex with the person. Then after much consideration they do it, always feeling either guilty or expecting a more serious engagement with the person whom they just bedded.

  Then we have other women who do not need a reason to have sex, who are so liberated that they choose to do it whenever they want and can. Women who afterwards go on with their lives never regretting the pleasure they have enjoyed. Poor of the woman who needs a reason to have sex, and ponders of the why's and how's instead of letting go of  all doubts. 

4. Men just need a place.- This is a feminist point of view that denigrate men, yet this statement apply to the whole human race. People need a place to interact with other people. Men and women, (any age, weight, height, etc...) enjoy intimate relations, they need to feel something beyod their realm.

5. A man can sleep around, no questions asked, but if a woman makes nineteen or twenty mistakes, then she's  a tramp.

Male chauvinism and even feminism has promoted this thruth, for no one ever questions a man when he sleep;s around. To say this is to admit that sleeping around is a mistake by writing that if a woman sleeps around is not just sleeping around she is also making a mistake. So, sleeping around is a mistake for both men and women.  

At first glance the thought presents itself as a feminist view point.